<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Unheralded Perspective</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sidkalra.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sidkalra.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on v1.0 Release - Getting the Localize Dates Link Working with the New Entries Loaded On Scroll by kolorowanki</title>
		<link>http://blog.sidkalra.com/2009/04/v10-release-getting-the-localize-dates-link-working-with-the-new-entries-loaded-on-scroll/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>kolorowanki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sidkalra.com/?p=533#comment-57</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot for this information! it is very useful, Thanks man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot for this information! it is very useful, Thanks man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Applying a patch to a Repo using Mercurial by Steve Losh</title>
		<link>http://blog.sidkalra.com/2008/10/applying-a-patch-to-a-repo-using-mercurial/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Losh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 20:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sidkalra.com/?p=81#comment-55</guid>
		<description>`hg import` is definitely the right way to import patches.  What was the error you were getting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>`hg import` is definitely the right way to import patches.  What was the error you were getting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on v0.4 Release - XSS vulnerabilities and Loader.gif Issues by Kolorowanki</title>
		<link>http://blog.sidkalra.com/2009/01/v04-release-xss-vulnerabilities-and-loadergif-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Kolorowanki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sidkalra.com/?p=286#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Great tutorial, I only draw but will pass your post address to my programmer. He will love it. Thanks for sharing.
Regards,
Matt Kolorowanki,
Illustrator</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great tutorial, I only draw but will pass your post address to my programmer. He will love it. Thanks for sharing.<br />
Regards,<br />
Matt Kolorowanki,<br />
Illustrator</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on v1.0 Release - Further Improving Bug Functionality for the OnScroll Patch by Gordon P. Hemsley</title>
		<link>http://blog.sidkalra.com/2009/04/v10-release-further-improving-bug-functionality-for-the-onscroll-patch/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon P. Hemsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 01:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sidkalra.com/?p=545#comment-49</guid>
		<description>There are still 3- and 4-digit bugs open. Is there a reason that you're not trying to take those into account?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are still 3- and 4-digit bugs open. Is there a reason that you&#8217;re not trying to take those into account?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on v0.8 Release - Improving the Coding Style for the OnScroll Patch by Ted Mielczarek</title>
		<link>http://blog.sidkalra.com/2009/03/v08-release-improving-the-coding-style-for-the-onscroll-patch/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Mielczarek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sidkalra.com/?p=440#comment-48</guid>
		<description>The coding convention here is "what Ted does". ;-) I'm not sure why I do things that way, it's just the style I've fallen into. I like having function braces on their own lines, as I think named top-level functions are important. In general I'm not terribly picky, as long as we're consistent within a file.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The coding convention here is &#8220;what Ted does&#8221;. <img src='http://blog.sidkalra.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> I&#8217;m not sure why I do things that way, it&#8217;s just the style I&#8217;ve fallen into. I like having function braces on their own lines, as I think named top-level functions are important. In general I&#8217;m not terribly picky, as long as we&#8217;re consistent within a file.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on v0.8 Release - Improving the Coding Style for the OnScroll Patch by Justin Wood (Callek)</title>
		<link>http://blog.sidkalra.com/2009/03/v08-release-improving-the-coding-style-for-the-onscroll-patch/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Wood (Callek)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sidkalra.com/?p=440#comment-47</guid>
		<description>for the &#124;var&#124; inside the if's etc. I'd actually recommend putting var at the start of the function and leave the values undefined until needed.

The point is that var is scoped to the whole function, and as such that once you define it, the entire function (not just that block) can use it.

Alternatively use &#124;let&#124; at the highest scope you need to (in this case, probably the for loop)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for the |var| inside the if&#8217;s etc. I&#8217;d actually recommend putting var at the start of the function and leave the values undefined until needed.</p>
<p>The point is that var is scoped to the whole function, and as such that once you define it, the entire function (not just that block) can use it.</p>
<p>Alternatively use |let| at the highest scope you need to (in this case, probably the for loop)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on v0.8 Release - Improving the Coding Style for the OnScroll Patch by Sid</title>
		<link>http://blog.sidkalra.com/2009/03/v08-release-improving-the-coding-style-for-the-onscroll-patch/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 16:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sidkalra.com/?p=440#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Hi Gordon,

Until recently I was putting the curly braces on a new line whenever I was writing new code. However, I've noticed that not many projects follow this style. They prefer to put the curly braces on the same line. I've always found it easier to read the code if the braces are on a new line so I don't understand why most people prefer to the other convention (braces on the same line).

As for line breaks, I'm with you. I don't like to bunch everything up together. I prefer gaps, which increases readability, at least for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gordon,</p>
<p>Until recently I was putting the curly braces on a new line whenever I was writing new code. However, I&#8217;ve noticed that not many projects follow this style. They prefer to put the curly braces on the same line. I&#8217;ve always found it easier to read the code if the braces are on a new line so I don&#8217;t understand why most people prefer to the other convention (braces on the same line).</p>
<p>As for line breaks, I&#8217;m with you. I don&#8217;t like to bunch everything up together. I prefer gaps, which increases readability, at least for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on v0.8 Release - Improving the Coding Style for the OnScroll Patch by Gordon P. Hemsley</title>
		<link>http://blog.sidkalra.com/2009/03/v08-release-improving-the-coding-style-for-the-onscroll-patch/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon P. Hemsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 16:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sidkalra.com/?p=440#comment-45</guid>
		<description>When I'm coding in PHP, I use curly braces on their own line, because it makes it easy to see where blocks begin and end. When I hack on Bespin nowadays (in JavaScript), I always have trouble figuring out where the blocks begin, because they keep the curly braces in the same line as other code. This also causes frustration when having to copy, move, or delete a certain block of code, because you can't just select certain lines—you have to select certain parts of the beginning and/or end lines.

As for spaces, I prefer no space between function names and opening parentheses, but spaces between parentheses and arguments. The same goes for other parentheses—spaces on the inside side of them. As for line breaks, I'm a lot freer with them than the Bespin code seems to be. I like to separate things logically so it's not all bunched together.

(And, yes, I'm aware you're not talking about Bespin. It's just the only difference in coding styles that I can relate to recently.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I&#8217;m coding in PHP, I use curly braces on their own line, because it makes it easy to see where blocks begin and end. When I hack on Bespin nowadays (in JavaScript), I always have trouble figuring out where the blocks begin, because they keep the curly braces in the same line as other code. This also causes frustration when having to copy, move, or delete a certain block of code, because you can&#8217;t just select certain lines—you have to select certain parts of the beginning and/or end lines.</p>
<p>As for spaces, I prefer no space between function names and opening parentheses, but spaces between parentheses and arguments. The same goes for other parentheses—spaces on the inside side of them. As for line breaks, I&#8217;m a lot freer with them than the Bespin code seems to be. I like to separate things logically so it&#8217;s not all bunched together.</p>
<p>(And, yes, I&#8217;m aware you&#8217;re not talking about Bespin. It&#8217;s just the only difference in coding styles that I can relate to recently.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on v0.7 Release - Repeating Bug with Merge Changesets by Justin Wood (Callek)</title>
		<link>http://blog.sidkalra.com/2009/03/v07-release-repeating-bug-with-merge-changesets/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Wood (Callek)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sidkalra.com/?p=402#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Without staring at code, it sounds like you should really be only showing what changesets are _pushed_. IE. the merge is also a changeset.

If people need to see what the merge's parents are they can click through to see the merge.

So it sounds like what happens here is that you are displaying the merge's parent(s) rather than the the push's themselves.

Realize that a merge will always have two parents, one of which is *very likely* to have been there from a previous push.

In future I may have time to stare at this code with you and work out a solution if you don't beat me to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without staring at code, it sounds like you should really be only showing what changesets are _pushed_. IE. the merge is also a changeset.</p>
<p>If people need to see what the merge&#8217;s parents are they can click through to see the merge.</p>
<p>So it sounds like what happens here is that you are displaying the merge&#8217;s parent(s) rather than the the push&#8217;s themselves.</p>
<p>Realize that a merge will always have two parents, one of which is *very likely* to have been there from a previous push.</p>
<p>In future I may have time to stare at this code with you and work out a solution if you don&#8217;t beat me to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on v0.7 Release - Reducing Code Duplication by Justin Wood (Callek)</title>
		<link>http://blog.sidkalra.com/2009/03/v07-release-reducing-code-duplication/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Wood (Callek)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sidkalra.com/?p=413#comment-43</guid>
		<description>s/attrib/argument/ from my last comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>s/attrib/argument/ from my last comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
